This is in no way of a demand or looking for some answers in the light of recent events.
Sometime in the past, years ago, a (retired?)staff member member said they would try to be more transparent with us in regards to knowing who each of them were. It was nice, I felt like we were closer as a community over all. I know they did not promise us to continue to be transparent, and as you can see I personally do not know half the staff (before recent new ones and before some had quit) because I don't try to snoop around or pry them directly of their identification or knew them before they became staff.
It would be lovely if we can see the transparency once more after so many years, and I guess maybe after more staff are hired and including the recent retired staff. They did it before, why not again?
This is just a suggestion and do not expect anything in the future.
Sometime in the past, years ago, a (retired?)staff member member said they would try to be more transparent with us in regards to knowing who each of them were. It was nice, I felt like we were closer as a community over all. I know they did not promise us to continue to be transparent, and as you can see I personally do not know half the staff (before recent new ones and before some had quit) because I don't try to snoop around or pry them directly of their identification or knew them before they became staff.
It would be lovely if we can see the transparency once more after so many years, and I guess maybe after more staff are hired and including the recent retired staff. They did it before, why not again?
This is just a suggestion and do not expect anything in the future.