What Came First? The Chicken or The Egg?

The Chicken or The Egg?

  • The Chicken

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • The Egg

    Votes: 6 46.2%

  • Total voters
    13

Valkyrie

Not so Active Member
#1
This is a debate on evolution, so what do you believe came first? The chicken, or the egg?
 
#2
the chicken because i believe in evolution. all a person needs to do to grasp it is look at their own immune system. tell me thats not it at its basest!
 

Whispered

Well-Known Member
#8
In terms of evolutionary biology, the egg would have to come first.

Consider this: Say the direct ancestor of the chicken (the thing that gave birth to the first thing we'd call a chicken) was a pterodactyl (again, hypothetical, and i just like that word). When that thing laid the egg, the egg had the mutations to make it a chicken. The mutations happen before the egg, not at hatching - thus the only logical explanation is that the egg, technically, came before the first of whatever organism hatched from it :)
 
#9
In terms of evolutionary biology, the egg would have to come first.

Consider this: Say the direct ancestor of the chicken (the thing that gave birth to the first thing we'd call a chicken) was a pterodactyl (again, hypothetical, and i just like that word). When that thing laid the egg, the egg had the mutations to make it a chicken. The mutations happen before the egg, not at hatching - thus the only logical explanation is that the egg, technically, came before the first of whatever organism hatched from it :)
More or less what I would have said.

The first chicken egg was a mutated proto-chicken egg laid by a proto-chicken. The egg came first.
 

allison

Well-Known Member
#11
it's kind of confusing because if the egg came first, who laid it? And if the chicken came first, where did it hatch from? I think it would make more sense from an evolutionary standpoint to say the chicken came first


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Valkyrie

Not so Active Member
#13
In terms of evolutionary biology, the egg would have to come first.

Consider this: Say the direct ancestor of the chicken (the thing that gave birth to the first thing we'd call a chicken) was a pterodactyl (again, hypothetical, and i just like that word). When that thing laid the egg, the egg had the mutations to make it a chicken. The mutations happen before the egg, not at hatching - thus the only logical explanation is that the egg, technically, came before the first of whatever organism hatched from it :)
I'd have to agree with this, because a chicken can't just pop up out of nowhere, there had to be an ancestor of the chicken that laid an egg and that egg became the chicken.
 
Top