Personally, I don't think he's doing as bad as Bush did, nor as well as Clinton did.
He's sorta being more personal with people, legalizing gay marriage for example,
but lacking in the money side of the issues. He ended the war, and that's a big
point for him in many peoples books.
He's sorta being more personal with people, legalizing gay marriage for example,
but lacking in the money side of the issues. He ended the war, and that's a big
point for him in many peoples books.
Nitpick though: I don't think Clinton was that great. His success was a matter of being in the right place at the right time. We could have had a can of beans as the President and the economy would have boomed regardless. (Thank you, Internet.) I've seen arguments that he set the housing collapse into motion. Admittedly, Bush exacerbated the oncoming disaster and ignored some warning signs, but the financial sector was deregulated during the Clinton administration.