Just want to say that that article contains multiple blatant lies:
(the total number of cancellations is over 5 million and counting, but hey, maybe they just "forgot" to put in another zero. likely it was an "accident" -cough-)
----------
But see, did conservatives deserve discredit over something they rarely, if ever, commented about?
The democrats have been defending Ms. Clinton and saying things that are at best horribly misinformed after being proven to be wrong about this incident since it happened, and they won't stop. It's like the boy who cried wolf. They keep crying "accident" and "nothing bad happened" and you and I both admit nobody really knows because they block all investigation attempts at it. That doesn't deserve discrediting?
(the total number of cancellations is over 5 million and counting, but hey, maybe they just "forgot" to put in another zero. likely it was an "accident" -cough-)
----------
But see, did conservatives deserve discredit over something they rarely, if ever, commented about?
The democrats have been defending Ms. Clinton and saying things that are at best horribly misinformed after being proven to be wrong about this incident since it happened, and they won't stop. It's like the boy who cried wolf. They keep crying "accident" and "nothing bad happened" and you and I both admit nobody really knows because they block all investigation attempts at it. That doesn't deserve discrediting?
Did they deserve discrediting? Maybe, again, I can't be sure.
But on the news? No, they didn't. I don't need their opinion on what's going on.
When people hear something they agree with from a network, they begin to rely on the network to think for them. Benghazi was a good example. Sure, it was a humongous blunder for the Democratic Party. And when Fox News reports it like that, it strengthens peoples trust in Fox News for opinions, not facts.