Jasmine: Does "reluctance" involve sending her pet tiger to rip off a man's pants off? If so, then I really need to meet the person who made these images cause they sound fun. Jasmine blatantly refuses to agree on a suitor, for the simple reason that she wants love to be on her own terms. Which is not an oh-so-bad thing. It frustrates her father, but ultimately he understands why she's hesitant and so he doesn't press her. Now, her sexual attractiveness is something that drives a small portion of the plot, but she also uses that trait of hers to deceive the villain (which is cool okay let's not pretend it's not) and even double take on Aladdin. Jasmine's most important trait is that she acts of her own free will and no man can take that from her. She does not let a man or her desire to seek a truly loving relationship define her. I'm slightly convinced the author was just looking for any fault here, but I mean seriously Jasmine is nearly flawless as an independent character and has MUCH more quality and development than Snow White and Aurora.
Ariel: She gets a lot of heat for the plot of her movie, but let's just analyze everything we ARE given about Ariel prior to the all famous Ursula scene. Everything in this movie is a result of a mixture of things, but faux-feminism tends to only recognize the one singular reason/event that they are oh so against. Ariel has wanted to see the human world, she's fascinated by it. She also has a very unstable love/hate relationship with her father, which already screams a plot point that will drive the movie. Add a dash of "omg I just met this hot guy the other day and we're soulmates", and you've basically got a good pot of "Very Valid Reasons To Not Be A Mermaid Anymore". By the time we reach Ursula's lair, Ariel is broken. She doesn't feel safe or happy with her father. Her only real safe haven is destroyed and everything she worked so hard to collect is gone. Right now, she feels like she has every right to indulge herself and meet this one last connection she has to a dream she's had for a very long time. Now, it's fair to say that she still gives up her voice and appearance for Eric, but then again... Is this even remotely treated as a good thing? No. It's treated as a bad thing, her friends try to stop her. Even Ariel hesitates, and Ursula is shown silently demoralizing it and making fun of her. But as we continue on, we start to see that the two actually have chemistry, and Ursula realizes that her plan has an actual flaw and her attempts at making Ariel too weak to hold anything together failed. Why? Because Ariel's actions and connection with Eric spoke louder than anything she could've said or sung. Even Eric realizes this and is close to asking to marry her before Ursula steps in. Everything in this movie is a mixture of things that on the surface seem vapid but when you ACTUALLY watch the movie and really take it all in, it's just not what the media and non-Disney fans say it is. The movie is nearly the same as the fairytale, it tells little girls to not change yourself just to be with someone, or to avoid a problem.
Belle: Any actual bs against anything in Beauty and the Beast is either due to someone just looking for a reason to hate it/hate Disney or the person didn't watch the movie. Belle has a million qualities to her personality and capabilities that surpass any initial judgments. She may be pretty, but her beauty's only true contribution to the movie is the villain's unsuccessful attempts at domesticating her. In the end the reason she saves the Beast is because she fulfilled the necessary qualifications of a 10 year old curse. The curse was that the Beast had to love someone and receive their love in return. Oh wait... so... nothing about sexual attractiveness? Nope. In fact, the writer, Howard Ashman, explicitly makes it very obvious that their relationship is driven on the fact that both are freaking social pariahs. Belle is an outcast because of her disinterest in the community's blatant ignorance of her father and her love of books. She finds comfort and safety with the Beast in time and she grows to trust him. Which is also the point of the fairytale, though the tale is a lot less political in its message. I'm serious though, if anyone says something bad about Beauty and the Beast in a "social justice" argument of any kind I will rip them a part because this movie is beautiful and Belle is literally one of the most amazing fictional characters ever.
Cinderella: AH! The weakest of them all! The one all modern day "feminists" will compare the most and drag for filth! Because she is the most recognizable of all the Disney Princesses! Cinderella suffers from the same dilemma Snow White and Aurora do: being a product of a very sexist period in history. That doesn't excuse anything, of course, so instead of making excuses, let's, yet again, examine the facts of Cinderella's predicament. Let's see... She loses her mother at a very young age so that's a bit emotionally scarring. Then her father remarries, probably rather quickly which would also be negative for a young girl, but whatever people move on. However, it's made clear that her step-family hates her when the prologue is being said. Then, her father dies, tears are shed, and her step-mother inherits the house. Following something that I can imagine is even more emotionally jarring, her step-mother sends her to the tower and makes her the house maid, forcing her to do all the chores and take care of the stables and the animals in the yard. Basically, Cinderella is forced into labor for her own house, something that was once a safe haven. She's treated terribly by her family, the devil cat is literally no help, but the most important factor is that she, like Snow White, doesn't give up. She still thinks her life will turn around. At one point, she thinks it will. A letter is sent to the house inviting all eligible maidens to a ball that's welcoming the Prince. Cinderella makes a bargain with her step-mother that if she gets all of her work done in time and get a dress ready, she can go. When she does that, her sisters rip it to shreds and she loses hope. She is then helped by a fairy godmother and given the special treatment, and for one night she can pretend to be a princess, the prettiest girl in the world (but like no one would do that right?). At the end of the night, she's left with one last glass slipper and when the Grand Duke comes by to do the shoe test thing, and then break it (which is really stupid of him, but in all fairness that gosh darn step-mother), Cinderella presents the other shoe and provides her own ticket out of her terrible life. You can argue that she was given help multiple times throughout the movie, but I could also argue that the ones who did help her were people who genuinely cared about her. Which gives a message that, help and a happy ending are given to people who deserve them. Cinderella did what she could with what she was given, and because she was an honest, hopeful, and kind person she was rewarded with a wonderful night and ultimately a marriage proposal.
I'm not going to address the princes, because I'm pretty sure I made my point clear. The person who made those two images have a blatant disregard for what the movies are actually about and only want to dig a stupid, half-hearted analysis on how to evaluate a Disney movie and tearing it down with feminism. Half of the movies are products of a sexist time, but let's not pretend that a woman can't learn anything valuable from Cinderella, or any Disney movie for that matter. These kinds of arguments are stupid and I seriously recommend that you don't take them to heart because they're not true.