See, that's what I'm not sure about. Thinking from a psychological perspective (and thinking about child development and how an average 14 year old's brain works), I just really don't think she was manipulated in anyway. People assume that kids are super impressionable and will just agree to anything like that, but that's not true at all. I was her age 5 years ago and I never would've done anything like this. The whole thing seems really fishy to me.
You could be right; she could really have just been that impressionable (why she would've been, I have no idea... I've known kids that age that wouldn't have been that impressionable). I just feel like the article is written in a way that shows she really wasn't a victim. Just my opinion though. Regardless, I agree; what he did was criminal and he's at fault. I'm just not sure about the girl's innocence, but I guess we'll all have to wait and see as the story unfolds.